by Menelik Charles...London, England
The idea that an ideology of white-male supremacy underpins the IR blogging of Sara and her ‘sisters’ is hardly news. However, Black Unity Bloggers (BU bloggers) often assume that IR bloggers actually believe in what they assert i.e. that white men are inherently superior to Black men. But as I’ve said elsewhere, they believe no such thing! Certainly, I can see how BU bloggers can miss this crucial fact; especially given how often they’re put on the defensive by the sheer unbridled racial viciousness of the attacks levelled against them.
The purpose of this post then is to help move BU bloggers away from mere defensive-counter-arguments, and towards subjecting the underlying motives of IR bloggers to a more penetrative analysis. This is necessary not least because it matters not one jot how righteous is the defence of the ‘Black-male image’ since the likes of Sara and Evia will continue to hate ‘n’ bait Black men until reality intervenes to direct these sad and desperate ‘sisters’ towards their predictably tragic ends.
attacks against Jewish men while promoting
Jewish female, German male unions
So where might we begin our analysis? Let’s begin by asking ourselves a few questions. To begin with, how possible is it for women of one race to hate ‘n’ bait men of their own race, and then be able to form genuine loving relationships with men of an opposing race? Would it not strike you as odd, for example, if a tiny group of Jewish women launched internet-based anti-Semitic attacks on Jewish men, lauding the virtues of German men, while simultaneously promoting an ideology of Aryan-male supremacy? What could possibly compel Jewish women to call on other Jewish women to seek out intimate relations with German males? An imagined mass rejection by Jewish men in favour of blond-haired German frauleins?
One might wonder why this peculiar group of imaginary (!) Jewish females do not actively promote intimate relationships more generally across the racial and cultural spectrum; say between Jewish women and Black, Latino, Asian or Anglo-Saxon men. And why on earth should such women apparently choose to spew anti-Jewish male rhetoric, and underpin it with Nazi ideology? Because they couldn’t get a date?
If such a group of self-hating Jewish women existed, they would, in fact, have no alternative but to promote intimate relationships with Hitler’s racial heirs over other types of men as this would represents their only hope of sub-consciously:
(1) showing how deeply internalised is their own oppression as Jews, and how
alienated they are from a positive, life-affirming Jewish-group identity;
(2) showing, by dating German men, the extent to which such unions causes them
deep sense of distress despite outward shows of romantic “happiness”;
(3) showing the consequences of the ‘woman scorned syndrome’ (e.g. by forming anti-Semitic alliances with a common foe) if their deep-down desire for a Jewish lover or husband remains unfulfilled.
An additional point here is that ONLY a Jewish woman/German male configuration can provide this intensely enraged and emotionally disturbed group of imagined Jewish females with the necessary anti-Semitic ideology with which to send out intricately-coded distress signals for potential Jewish male ‘saviours’ to decipher. This sub-conscious, clandestine operation is so high risk that the likely response to it is a massive Jewish-male backlash resulting in a further vicious male-baiting by a now increasingly desperate and deranged Jewish-Nazi sisterhood. They may call their campaign one of “empowerment” but, in truth it is a tale of woe since they’re forever complaining about and baiting a group of men they claim they want nothing more to with (easy when you perceive yourself as being rejected by them!).
So from problems alluded to but not discussed, there has emerged a conflict between Black men and women that is so perverse in its attempts to inflict pain and public humiliation that its akin to being forced to watch paedophilic porn at gunpoint! Indeed, it’s so wicked in its depth of malevolence that it almost transcends the notion of betrayal! Consider for example, how Sara and Evia represent the only racial group on the net (other than white supremacists) which draws so heavily and explicitly on both the ideology of white supremacy and its descriptive language of Black male “racial, intellectual and moral inferiority”! But how do they square this with the assertion of “Black female empowerment”?
Clearly, IR bloggers take a near orgasmic delight in the Black male predicament (which they never acknowledge) and make constant references to its consequences. They therefore deny the causes but embrace the effects! Black men, they declare, are “damaged beyond repair”. Ok. But “damaged” by what or by whom? We are NEVER told. By contrast, any “damage” evident in Black women - from low self-esteem to single parenthood, is as a direct result of some “low or no value” Black male. Interestingly, not once does Sara or Evia speak of ever loving an African-American male! It’s as if (as Sara writes in the comments section on her “Black love is dead!” post) Black men are merely:
suitable to be life mates or even casual partners”.
Naturally BU bloggers will react to comments like this with outrage. But stop! We only need to cite the words of slavery’s apologists, modern segregationists or some “maverick” white-male politician, to find exactly the same assertions made in reference to “innocent” Black females! I mean, is having children out of wedlock by one, two or more fathers evidence of sexual chastity, or suitability for life-long partnerships? Are not such Black women “uncivilised” and, from a man’s perspective, suitable only for “casual” sex?
IR bloggers are so consumed by self-hatred that only white racist ideology is sufficient to explain why they are patently unable to acquire a suitable Black “mate” or “even a casual partner” (e.g. because Black men are “uncivilised”). Indeed, they are so embittered that any sensitive Black male would be so unsettled by the aura of contempt which they typically convey (on the street, in the workplace, and at the club) that they’d run a country mile so as to avoid them! Thus, the fact that Black women may out-number Black men in the US, have more college degrees and jobs, is of little consequence here since these IR bloggers are, from the outset, “not suitable as life mates or even casual partners”!
And since white “damsels” - whom Black men have traditionally been warned against associating with by protective Black mothers, and rope-wielding white men, are now free to pursue “tall, dark and handsome men”, they too must be symbolically destroyed (or should that be lynched?). To achieve this symbolic twin-destruction, IR bloggers advocate what amounts to racist alliances (certainly more racist than ‘romantic’) with white men since this is the only means by which to gain the attention of Black men, and more significantly, to sub-consciously seek out a “Black Knight” (yes, a “Black Knight”!) to decode their feminine distress signals and rescue them from their awful plight!
To be continued...